It is important to make the distinction between an entertainer and a journalist. A journalist reports news in a straightforward manner with as little bias as is possible, while an entertainer, especially one of Moore's girth and appetite, thrive on rabble-rousing the leftist-pinko-panty-wad party into a froth of parroting indignation. He did it with Bowling for Columbine, as Moore repeatedly ambushed movie stars and television celebrities with questions about guns and violence. Nobody knew the answers to his questions, including Moore. Not once was the audience given even a hypothesis explaining why America is such a violent culture, which was really the underlying question of the entire "documentary". Moore doesn't attempt to explain it, and in fact never makes a legitimate effort to try. Instead he relied on guerilla tactics to capture the reactions of people caught off guard by his accusatory inquiries, or flat out running away from his salivating jowls.
But enough about that movie, let's talk about Fahrenheit 9/11, not to be confused with the more worthy Reno 911. The first act of the movie exposes the Bush family's interests in big oil, their ties to the Saudi royal family, and the proposed pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan. Because we are the radical left, conscientious citizens of the rock n' roll generation, we've already read Noam Chomsky's essays, and we already know all of that. Chomsky has always got the real scoop. The guy does his homework and really thinks about issues, while Michael Moore is at home licking gravy off his lap and thinking of snide questions to ask congressmen.
The second act of 9/11 uncovers the secret that no one ever knew: some people profit from military actions. No. Fucking. Duh. As it makes this death defying leap of faith, 9/11 seems to imply that Bizzaro Bush II, the tongue tied Texas Rainman was a willing accomplice in the WTC attacks, or that at the very least, it was directly his fault. Now, we all know that Bush is a warmongering toady of the oil industry, hell-bent on going down in the history books as the cowboy hero who crushed the world in his hands until all the evil oozed out between his fingers. Shit, his dad was the same way, and that's why we didn't fucking re-elect him. Not that I vote. I don't, so it's not my fault. So it was no surprise when we went to war with Afghanistan, and it wasn't surprising when Bush turned around and blamed Iraq. What was surprising, however, was that all of you dumb fucking mouth-breathers fell for the biggest red herring ever thrown in someone's face. The pathetic thing is Michael Moore fell for it as well.
The third act of Fahrenheit is all about the pointlessness of the invasion of Iraq. That's it. We see interview after interview of soldiers and family members questioning the validity of attacking Iraq, footage of midnight raids in Iraq, and Iraqi people being mad at us for cooking them with bombs. It goes on and on and on. Oddly enough, one feels that those soldiers and their families are the same people who had American flags suction-cupped to the passenger side windows when everyone first started talking about disarming Sadam. Figuring out that none of it made any sense was easy; figuring that out after you've napalmed your third village is retarded.